Sign up to our free weekly IndyTech newsletter delivered straight to your inbox Sign up to our free IndyTech newsletter Sign up to our free IndyTech newsletter Please enter a valid email address Please enter a valid email address SIGN UP I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our privacy policy Thanks for signing up to the IndyTech email {{ #verifyErrors }} {{ message }} {{ /verifyErrors }} {{ ^verifyErrors }} Something went wrong. Please try again later {{ /verifyErrors }} A coalition of rural, wildlife and conservation bodies has called for an urgent review of the rollout of mobile network infrastructure across Scotland amid concerns about the impact of masts on the country’s most remote spaces.
Organisations including the John Muir Trust, Mountaineering Scotland and RSPB Scotland have written to Sir Chris Bryant, Westminster’s minister of state for digital and data infrastructure, asking for a review of the Total Not-Spot (TNS) element of the Shared Rural Network (SRN) programme. The programme, introduced under the previous Conservative administration, is a collaboration between the UK Government and mobile phone operators including O2 and Vodafone, seeking to achieve 95% 4G mobile phone coverage across Britain. But the coalition believes the approach taken to achieve the desired coverage so far has been “target-led”, “top-down” and is “failing to consider whether people living in rural areas need the masts”.
We are urging the Government to undertake a review of the TNS programme and take a pragmatic approach rather than simply pushing forward in order to achieve ill-devised targets Sarah-Jane Laing, Scottish Land and Estates In Scotland, 260 sites have been classified as TNS – areas the coalition argues have been selected mainly to provide landmass coverage and meet geographical targets of the programme rather than prioritise coverage for communities or transport routes. Member groups believe this has resulted in a scenario where extremely remote and ecologically fragile areas have been chosen to accommodate unnecessary masts, along with related infrastructure and access roads.
The coalition argues that widespread agreement among its member organizations about the impact of the rollout demonstrates the need for an urgent review and to assess how the financial resources behind the TNS element of the program could be better used. **Detailed Text:**
The coalition, comprised of various organizations, has come together to advocate for a critical review of a specific program element. Their argument hinges on the shared understanding among their members regarding the program’s impact.
“We are urging the Government to undertake a review of the TNS programme and take a pragmatic approach rather than simply pushing forward in order to achieve ill-devised targets.” We need connectivity where we live and work, not in our most fragile and remote wild places Thomas Widrow, John Muir Trust Thomas Widrow, head of campaigns for the John Muir Trust, said: “Decisions taken in Westminster are impacting beautiful and incredibly important wild places hundreds of miles away. “As a charity whose purpose is to protect wild places, we are alarmed that damage will be inflicted on landscapes and wildlife with no evident public or environmental benefits.
“Rural communities and outdoor enthusiasts alongside environmental organisations are speaking with one voice – we need connectivity where we live and work, not in our most fragile and remote wild places. “The new UK Government needs to listen to this unprecedented alliance of voices and pause and review the TNS programme. “Wild places, the biodiversity they shelter and the people they benefit deserve nothing less.” Duncan Orr-Ewing, head of species and land management at RSPB Scotland, said: ““Whilst initially well-intentioned, the SRN mast rollout has subsequently raised significant concerns, with development proposals coming forward that we believe will impact some of our most threatened species and habitats, and in places where we believe that the case for these mast developments is weak.
“We stand together with landowners, communities and other conservation eNGOs in calling on the UK Government to review the current programme, and to listen to the genuine and deepfelt views of the various stakeholders in Scotland.” Publicly-funded masts will be shared by all four mobile network operators to minimise impact on the environment and, wherever possible, the programme will utilise existing infrastructure Department for Science, Innovation and Technology A spokeswoman for the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology said: “We’re bringing fast, reliable 4G mobile coverage to the hardest-to-reach parts of the country, to not only benefit those living and working in these areas but also to help emergency services save lives and support tourism as people visit the area.
“It is for the local planning authority, who best know the area and local concerns, to assess planning applications for these masts. “Publicly-funded masts will be shared by all four mobile network operators to minimise impact on the environment and, wherever possible, the programme will utilise existing infrastructure.”
